In Hungary, as a consequence of the failure to achieve post-civil war reconciliation, memory work about the Holocaust has been mapped onto existing ideological fault lines in society, hampering norm entrepreneurs in their attempts to achieve wider success in integrating perpetrator perspectives into practices of remembrance.

I argue that Austria’s relative belatedness in fostering reflection on perpetrator legacies is due to the priority accorded to reconciling the left- and right-wing political traditions in the wake of an interwar cycle of civil violence. I treat the German case as paradigmatic, representing successive waves of norm entrepreneurship, which have pushed German mnemonic practices towards negative possession of identity. Sections on Germany, Austria, and Hungary revisit the histories of collective memory in the three countries to determine the social and political conditions that made such radical practices possible and how, if at all, these societies arrived at these conditions.

I investigate these practices through the concept of “negative possession of identity” ( npi) as proposed by Arie Nadler, who built upon Jean Améry’s theorizing on the subject. Practices of claiming collective ownership of perpetrator roles in genocide represent a more radical approach to memory work than mere acknowledgement of past crimes. In this paper, I present an interpretation of German, Austrian and Hungarian politics of memory, with a focus on the emergence and integration of perpetrator legacies into practices of remembrance.

Terror in resonance ost download